subscribe or follow us:                    

An Open Letter to The "Tea Party"

4 comments

They thought they had a revolution. They all wanted to change the world. As Vietnam raged on and race wars were fought in the U.S. revolution took a new face.  This was not the revolution of the European white slave owning wealthy male patriarch of 1776 this was an American Revolution. They lost. Vietnam was not stopped due to their voice.  Limited liberty was gained for race. The American Empire took it all absorbed it and continued to wage wars and grow.

If ever the revolution comes it must not accept the system.  It must not “work within the system.” The system is the problem and the empire will not cease it’s wars.  We must abolish the system. This concept of taming the beast must be seen for the myth it is.

Your “state’s right’s” are still the rights of the state and not liberty or the rights of a minority or an individual.  To defend the state you defend only the state and not liberty. The state is founded upon the might of it’s militarization.  To maintain this you will never abolish the tyranny. To perpetuate this you will only find a new master to serve.

Unless your tea party can learn to reject all tyranny of the state it is hypocrisy.  You cheer the money spent in Arizona to assert the power of the state against a people group. This is why the anti-statist can not support or even begin to condone any bit of what you claim to stand for.  The entire premise of what you support in in this is the racism you deny.  By picking and choosing the big government you want any argument you hold against the other areas of big government you want others to not receive is negated.

You are the statist.

Comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

  • http://twitter.com/ruffedge ruffedge

    There is no tyranny and the state has the responsibility, not the right, to protect those "citizens" living within it's boundaries. Arizona's immigration bill is intended to combat the problems rising within the state due to the influx of illegal immigrants. The Clinton, the Bush and now the Obama administrations have, (no doubt in the hopes of creating a larger voting block for their respective parties), dragged their feet in dealing with the problem of illegal immigration into this country. Now, due to rising crime rates in the south west, one state has resolved to take a stand to end this problem. Yes, it's too bad that native born and naturalized Mexican American citizens might have to provide proof of their citizenship, but had the federal government performed it's duties in the first place, this situation would be non existent.At some point, political correctness must be pushed aside and logic and common sense must take over. If a sect within an ethnic group is acting outside of the law and endangering citizens within the law, then it only stands to reason that the ethnic group in question would be the starting point in fixing this problem. Tying law enforcement’s hands with the politically correct and restrictive chains of “profiling” is insane and will only cause the problem to grow and continue to endanger those citizens, regardless of race, who stay inside the law. The left is unable to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. The TEA Party welcomes all those that have entered the nation through the proper legal channels and who agree with those ideals that the TEA party represents. The left's blending of legal and illegal immigration serves no other purpose than to label those on the right as racists. It’s just another straw man argument.

  • http://twitter.com/ruffedge ruffedge

    There is no tyranny and the state has the responsibility, not the right, to protect those “citizens” living within it’s boundaries. Arizona’s immigration bill is intended to combat the problems rising within the state due to the influx of illegal immigrants. The Clinton, the Bush and now the Obama administrations have, (no doubt in the hopes of creating a larger voting block for their respective parties), dragged their feet in dealing with the problem of illegal immigration into this country. Now, due to rising crime rates in the south west, one state has resolved to take a stand to end this problem. Yes, it’s too bad that native born and naturalized Mexican American citizens might have to provide proof of their citizenship, but had the federal government performed it’s duties in the first place, this situation would be non existent.

    At some point, political correctness must be pushed aside and logic and common sense must take over. If a sect within an ethnic group is acting outside of the law and endangering citizens within the law, then it only stands to reason that the ethnic group in question would be the starting point in fixing this problem. Tying law enforcement’s hands with the politically correct and restrictive chains of “profiling” is insane and will only cause the problem to grow and continue to endanger those citizens, regardless of race, who stay inside the law.

    The left is unable to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. The TEA Party welcomes all those that have entered the nation through the proper legal channels and who agree with those ideals that the TEA party represents. The left’s blending of legal and illegal immigration serves no other purpose than to label those on the right as racists. It’s just another straw man argument.

    • http://twitter.com/daverag David R.

      So what if a private American decides to invite a Mexican (or anyone else) without asking the government for permission (as any free man would do)? At what point did the tyranny of bureaucracy become conservative American values?

      To me the only criteria of entry would be to be invited (by a private individual, corporation, school, whatever), and maybe a criminal background and medical check for contagious disease.

  • http://twitter.com/daverag David R.

    So what if a private American decides to invite a Mexican without asking the government for permission? At what point did the tyranny of bureaucracy become conservative American values? To me the only criteria of entry would be to be invited (by a private individual or corporation) and not having a contagious disease.