Prison For your Political Views: UPDATE
Feb 10, 2010 Anti-State, Libertarianism, Philosophy, Police State, Politics
UPDATE: It appears the facts of this story are in fact about 30 years late. This bill may be in the process of being repealed. The law is reality, only it has been an existing law since the 70’s, so this is nothing new or recently passed as assumed in the article. The facts of the law are all still relevant and true.
Yes! You can be placed in prison for your political views in South Carolina. The strength of the Police State continues to grow. The future looks grim. Independent Institute pointed out an article on The Raw Story: No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register. South Carolina did it. They are demanding that Anarchists and others register with the state. Let’s see you oppose the state so the state says you should register with them. To do what? To exist? To think? Let’s see:
They are calling it the Subversive Activities Registration Act. It is found under Title 23 Law Enforcement and Public Safety Chapter 29. Apparently they feel that law enforcement is on par some how with public safety; this could not be further from the truth. Now your political views are seen as some sort of menace to public safety? It is our views and philosophy that will have a future impact on the existence of the State. Yes, the truth threatens their control and ability to take from us or force themselves upon us. The Oppressor must maintain it’s power over the oppressed. The state sees a growing threat. Freedom can not be tolerated by the state.
The bill defines a Subversive Group as:
Tags: Freedom of speech, Police State, Political party, South Carolina
Militarized Police State Tyranny
Jan 20, 2010 Anti-State, Current, Police State, video
Man arrested for brushing by a Privileged Class the Police.
A Case For Self-Governance: The Business of Peace
Jan 18, 2010 A Case For Self-Governance, Anti-State, Anti-War, Police State, Social Issues
I feel peace is a good topic for Martin Luther King Jr’s Birthday. It was not planned like that, it just happened that way.
War is the governments business and business is good. From military imperialism to militarized police the government is in the business of death and theft. The government is in the business of forcing people to do what it wants with its guns. We discussed in A Case Against Government Part 1: Police State how police are not for the people but to serve the interest of the state. I would like to expand on a concept that Stefan Molyneux of Free Domain Radio proposed in his Lew Rockwell article The Stateless Society: An Examination of Alternatives. The idea is the the Dispute Resolution Organization (DRO). I would like to point out the business of peace can be a highly marketable thing to sell as opposed to the business of war which brings financial disaster, death and destruction.
A DRO is described on Wikipedia as:
a conceptualized organization providing services such as mediation and arbitration through the private sector.
This is his answer to the common question and objection of the statist, “What about Police?” No, we do not need police but we do have disputes that need a resolution. Will it end rape? No, but it will come closer to ending violence and rape than any police force or government entity has proven capable of doing. We see their failure in the fact that these issues still have little resolution or advancements, only a culture that reacts with vengeance towards people.
Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Martin Luther King, Non-profit organization, Violence and Abuse
A Case For Self Governance: High Fashion
Jan 10, 2010 A Case For Self-Governance, Anti-State, Libertarianism, Philosophy, Police State
This is not about government control this is about the redundant responses people give me when I say I oppose all government. I am going to talk about a world where the government came in and took over all clothing manufacturers and began to be the sole provider of clothing. What was created was two wasteful bureaucracies to create low quality clothes at a higher rice subsidized by our taxes. We will call our new government agency the Government Agency for Clothes Control (GACC) You get essentially K-mart quality for Armani prices. Fashion will be frozen. Any advancements from creativity and modern inventions in fashion will cease. This will freeze the clothes we wear as the government sees necessary. Now, I am not painting this illustration to show why I oppose government control, but to show the flaws in the many arguments for government control.
Now in this new system I will begin to say we need to abolish the GACC. This will lead to people screaming “You want the poor to go naked!” or “How would we get clothes?” and ” Why don’t you like clothes?” I have nothing against clothes. I wear clothes. I have never seen a naked homeless man in America. There are systems of charity and compassionate individuals who give gloves and coats at Christmas. I want clothes.
If You See Any Video I Post, See This One
Dec 4, 2009 Anti-State, Anti-War, Police State, video
Hate, violence, murder, oppression, war, and rape are disgusting tragedies that are realities of our government. We must not be silent. We must speak out on behalf of those who have no voice and power. Look at the true nature of governments.
The DMV Helps Itself
Dec 3, 2009 Anti-State, Fear And Loathing, Gonzo, Libertarianism, Police State
The power of the state oppresses. We’ve all dealt with the terrible monopoly of the DMV. The DMV operates on a completely government controlled market. The man this recently happened to wished to remain anonymous, so we will call him Bill. Bill’s had two cars, a wife and rented a little house. He had a van and a car that sat in the driveway because he could not afford to fix the vehicle up to the standards of the state. The state mandates required an inspection for function before he could put tags on the car. You have to pay the DMV the state said so.
One day Bill’s wife left and took the van. Bill found himself facing the financial burden of a divorce. In order to pay for his basic needs and the other demands now being made of him bill found himself driving the unregistered car to and from work. He was then pulled over
Read the rest of this entry »
A case against government Part 3: State Violence
Dec 1, 2009 A Case Against Government, Anti-State, Anti-War, Philosophy, Police State, PunkJohnnyCash Blog
It occurred to me that there may be those out there who read this site and still do not comprehend my philosophy. I think people loose me when they argue what the role government should have. I ask if we should have a government. My answer is no. I think a good place to start is to look at is what I call State Violence. In order to accept the existence of a state you must accept state violence. A state has no way to force it’s will upon the people without threat of force. In order for a state to exist it must embrace two basic forms of violation. These are theft and violence. The state exists as a parasitic entity that is destructive to both the host and itself.
I am convinced I should have started my series “A Case Against Government” with this article. It is the heart and base of all government power and violations.
Tags: Government, Violence and Abuse
Urgent Action needed to save H.R. 1207
Nov 3, 2009 Anti-State, Corporatism, Federal Reserve, Libertarianism, Police State, PunkJohnnyCash Blog, Senate
I received this in my in box from Audit The Fed .com and I thought it would be good to put this out there and pass it around so here it goes:
Urgent Action Needed
Dear Supporter of Transparency,
You and I face our biggest challenge yet.
Mel Watt (D-NC), Chairman of the Monetary Policy Subcommittee, has sided with Fed and is working to gut substantial audit provisions from HR 1207. The bill Congressman Watt has sent to the full Financial Services Committee contains no audit of the Fed’s monetary policy-making authority or transparency of the Fed’s secret agreements with foreign central banks.
Without these provisions, a so-called “audit” of the Fed would be worthless.
I Voted Today: Vote NO to the War on Drugs
Nov 3, 2009 Police State, Politics, PunkJohnnyCash Blog
The problem with legislation is always that a few humanitarian causes and a few good bits make it in with a load of tripe. So I ask you all if you want some corn will you look to consume the turd with a piece of corn in it, or will you hold off for the corn on the cob? In politics we dive after the corn in the turd consuming the entire piece of feces.
Here in Kansas City it is election day, and there is one single piece on the ballot. This is the COMBAT tax. I woke early this morning to walk out to the polls. I cast my vote against this terrible piece of leislation.
I am against tax, but the tax here was not my concern since it was so minimal. I was opposing where the money goes. This attempts to dress itself up like a humanitarian effort when in fact it only goes to pay more prosecutors and tyrant cops. This is strictly a way to fund the War on Drugs. I am opposed to drug use, but even more so I oppose government’s War on Drugs. I oppose the government having that much say in our lives.
The COMBAT tax goes to harm people with addictions, and to take away peoples houses. It fills our streets with soldiers in Combat against the evil plant marajuana. I beg you all in the Kansas City area, please get out today while you have a chance and say “NO!” to the War on Drugs.
Click Here for more information on the COMBAT tax.
News Roundup
Oct 29, 2009 Corporatism, Current, Libertarianism, News Roundup, Police State
Well it’s time for our second weekly news roundup. I hope you guys enjoy.

Health Care:
From Liberty Maven: Ron Paul, a hypocrite on the health care public option? (Click Here)
According to the “Left Wing” Democrat party if you do not vote for health care you must be a hypocrite. Well, not really. I do think the hypocrite list may have some weight, but to lump the one guy who has repeatedly refused Medicaid and Medicare in there seems off.
Gallop polls are showing that current Health Care legislation is loosing support (Click Here)
And Finally NancyPelosi has introduced her own health care bill. (Click here)
PelosiCare: 1,990 and $894 billion of bad news (Click Here)

