Post Tagged with: "international financial system"

CLUELESS: QE to Infinity

November 16, 2012 2:27 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: QE to Infinity

Based on what I have described of Bernanke’s policy failure so far, is it possible to predict anything about the future results of an open ended purchase of financial assets under QE3? I think so, and I share why in this last part of this series. Author: Jehu Eaves Visit [...]

Read more ›

CLUELESS: Bernanke’s desperate gambit

November 14, 2012 4:38 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: Bernanke’s desperate gambit

I stopped my examination of Bernanke’s approach to this crisis and the problem of deflation after looking at his 1991 paper and his speech in 2002. I now want to return to that series, examining two of his speeches this to discuss the problems confronting bourgeois monetary policy in the [...]

Read more ›

CLUELESS: “Deflation is bad. M’kay?”

October 21, 2012 2:44 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: “Deflation is bad. M’kay?”

The world market had been shaken by a series of financial crises, and the economy of Japan had fallen into a persistent deflationary state, When Ben Bernanke gave his 2002 speech before the National Economists Club, “Deflation: Making Sure “It” Doesn’t Happen Here”. Bernanke was going to explain to his [...]

Read more ›

CLUELESS: How Ben Bernanke is managing the demise of capitalism

October 17, 2012 5:09 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: How Ben Bernanke is managing the demise of capitalism

So I am spending a week or so trying to understand Ben Bernanke’s approach to this crisis based on three sources from his works. In this part, the source is an essay published in 1991: “The Gold Standard, Deflation, and Financial Crisis in the Great Depression: An International Comparison”. In [...]

Read more ›

How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition (2)

October 10, 2012 3:57 pm0 comments
How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition (2)

As a contribution to Occupy Wall Street’s efforts against debt, I am continuing my reading of William White’s “Ultra Easy Monetary Policy and the Law of Unintended Consequences” (PDF). I have covered sections A and B. In this last section I am looking at to section C of White’s paper [...]

Read more ›

Open Letter to Mr. Tsipras: You call that a fucking plan?

October 9, 2012 9:43 am0 comments
Open Letter to Mr. Tsipras: You call that a fucking plan?

To Mr. Tsipras of the Greece party, Syriza, I read your letter to Angela Merkel today the Guardian and was not impressed. Frankly, I expected a guy who just might be running Greece next year to have a better argument than the one you gave. You stated: As Angela Merkel [...]

Read more ›

How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition

September 23, 2012 4:40 pm2 comments
How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition

Since Occupy Wall Street appears to be undertaking a concerted push toward addressing the growing debt servitude of the mass of working families to Wall Street banksters, I thought it might be interesting to understand how the Federal Reserve is now doubling down on a policy of manufacturing an even [...]

Read more ›

Fiat currency: “No more money than a theatre ticket is”

June 9, 2012 11:26 am0 comments
Fiat currency: “No more money than a theatre ticket is”

I am adding additional comments to my reading of Weeks’ paper, “The theoretical and empirical credibility of commodity money” (PDF). In my first reading, I identified a problem with Weeks’ presentation of what he asserts is empirical evidence supporting a link between commodity-money and price. In my second reading I [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Final)

January 20, 2012 12:03 pm0 comments
Paul A. Samuelson: bald-faced liar and propagandist for the fascist state

(Or, more importantly, why should anarchists, libertarians and Marxists be as well) So, has any reader of this blog heard that economists have conceded Marx was right after all? Have you at any time during the past 40 years heard an economist admit that Marx was correct in his transformation [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part three)

January 14, 2012 11:55 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part three)

In my previous post, I stated: In reality, there was nothing in Bohm-Bawerk’s argument to be disproved. Bohm-Bawerk had indeed cited the essential contradiction at the core of capitalism. His problem, however, was to imagine the contradiction to be a defect of Marx’s theory, and not a fatal flaw laying [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part two)

January 13, 2012 11:15 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part two)

In the previous blog post, I argued that in each of the three great capitalist catastrophes of the 19th and 20th Centuries — the Long Depression, the Great Depression and the Great Stagflation — economists scurried to bone up on Marx in an effort to understand practical problems of state [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx?

January 9, 2012 7:17 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx?

I’m reading, “The Transformation Problem: A Tale of Two Interpretations”, by David Bieri. According to his profile, David studied economics at the London School of Economics and international finance at the University of Durham (UK). In 2006, he started his Ph.D. studies in SPIA. From 1999 until 2006, David held [...]

Read more ›

A Critique of Pure Bullshit, Part Three: Eichengreen on Ron Paul (A Tale of Two Monies)

September 2, 2011 11:03 am1 comment
A Critique of Pure Bullshit, Part Three: Eichengreen on Ron Paul (A Tale of Two Monies)

I have been critiquing Barry Eichengreen’s unprincipled attack on Ron Paul and his demand for a return to the gold standard, but, so far, I have danced around the real question posed by this vicious hit piece. Eichengreen’s argument is not about whether or not Ron Paul’s ideas can be [...]

Read more ›

A Critique of Pure Bullshit: Part Two: Eichengreen on Ron Paul (Money and Crisis)

August 30, 2011 12:36 pm2 comments
Austrian School economists Ludwig von Mises and his student Friedrich A. Hayek

    Barry Eichengreen makes much of the role the theories of Friedrich Hayek play in Ron Paul’s world view for a reason that becomes immediately clear: In his 2009 book, End the Fed, Paul describes how he discovered the work of Hayek back in the 1960s by reading The [...]

Read more ›

Eichengreen on Ron Paul and Gold as Money: Part One: A critique of pure bullshit:

August 29, 2011 10:22 am0 comments
Eichengreen on Ron Paul and Gold as Money: Part One: A critique of pure bullshit:

Washington has a problem, and Barry Eichengreen is doing his bit to save it. The problem’s name is Ron Paul, and this problem comes wrapped in 24 carat gold: GOLD IS back, what with libertarians the country over looking to force the government out of the business of monetary-policy making. [...]

Read more ›