Post Tagged with: "monetary policy"

Where the fuck is the ‘revolutionary subject’ in the European crisis? (2)

April 2, 2013 11:13 am0 comments
Where the fuck is the ‘revolutionary subject’ in the European crisis? (2)

Why the working class is not effectively defending itself actually is not a question posed by this crisis. Rather the question is: “So what else did you expect?” No matter how the working classes of Europe responded to this crisis politically, they were already effectively rendered politically defenseless before the [...]

Read more ›

CLUELESS: QE to Infinity

November 16, 2012 2:27 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: QE to Infinity

Based on what I have described of Bernanke’s policy failure so far, is it possible to predict anything about the future results of an open ended purchase of financial assets under QE3? I think so, and I share why in this last part of this series. Author: Jehu Eaves Visit [...]

Read more ›

CLUELESS: Bernanke’s desperate gambit

November 14, 2012 4:38 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: Bernanke’s desperate gambit

I stopped my examination of Bernanke’s approach to this crisis and the problem of deflation after looking at his 1991 paper and his speech in 2002. I now want to return to that series, examining two of his speeches this to discuss the problems confronting bourgeois monetary policy in the [...]

Read more ›

CLUELESS: “Deflation is bad. M’kay?”

October 21, 2012 2:44 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: “Deflation is bad. M’kay?”

The world market had been shaken by a series of financial crises, and the economy of Japan had fallen into a persistent deflationary state, When Ben Bernanke gave his 2002 speech before the National Economists Club, “Deflation: Making Sure “It” Doesn’t Happen Here”. Bernanke was going to explain to his [...]

Read more ›

CLUELESS: How Ben Bernanke is managing the demise of capitalism

October 17, 2012 5:09 pm0 comments
CLUELESS: How Ben Bernanke is managing the demise of capitalism

So I am spending a week or so trying to understand Ben Bernanke’s approach to this crisis based on three sources from his works. In this part, the source is an essay published in 1991: “The Gold Standard, Deflation, and Financial Crisis in the Great Depression: An International Comparison”. In [...]

Read more ›

How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition (2)

October 10, 2012 3:57 pm0 comments
How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition (2)

As a contribution to Occupy Wall Street’s efforts against debt, I am continuing my reading of William White’s “Ultra Easy Monetary Policy and the Law of Unintended Consequences” (PDF). I have covered sections A and B. In this last section I am looking at to section C of White’s paper [...]

Read more ›

How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition

September 23, 2012 4:40 pm2 comments
How Quantitative Easing really works: Occupy Wall Street Edition

Since Occupy Wall Street appears to be undertaking a concerted push toward addressing the growing debt servitude of the mass of working families to Wall Street banksters, I thought it might be interesting to understand how the Federal Reserve is now doubling down on a policy of manufacturing an even [...]

Read more ›

Fiat currency: “No more money than a theatre ticket is”

June 9, 2012 11:26 am0 comments
Fiat currency: “No more money than a theatre ticket is”

I am adding additional comments to my reading of Weeks’ paper, “The theoretical and empirical credibility of commodity money” (PDF). In my first reading, I identified a problem with Weeks’ presentation of what he asserts is empirical evidence supporting a link between commodity-money and price. In my second reading I [...]

Read more ›

Worthless money as a rational absurdity

June 5, 2012 10:03 am4 comments
Worthless money as a rational absurdity

I want to recommend everyone read John Weeks’ paper, “The theoretical and empirical credibility of commodity money“, because he presents a key to the analysis of neoclassical economic theory that unlocks its inner logic. I missed the juicy goodness of his argument in my first read because I have an [...]

Read more ›

The Trouble with Marxism (Part Two)

January 28, 2012 5:26 pm2 comments
The portion of the labor day that is socially necessary as a percentage of GDP

So, I got feedback from three people who, in one way or another, say they don’t understand my last post on my conversation with Andrew Kliman. One person posting on Reddit, complained it was too dense; another wondered if I was advocating a return to the gold standard; a third [...]

Read more ›

The Trouble with Marxism (Part One)

January 27, 2012 2:17 pm0 comments
The Trouble with Marxism (Part One)

Well, I have just about had enough of my conversation with The Andrew Kliman, so I thought I would try to assess what it accomplished, instead. My ‘tin-ear’ with Andrew began after a conversation with @skepoet on twitter about the odd divergence between gold and dollar measures of economic activity [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Final)

January 20, 2012 12:03 pm0 comments
Paul A. Samuelson: bald-faced liar and propagandist for the fascist state

(Or, more importantly, why should anarchists, libertarians and Marxists be as well) So, has any reader of this blog heard that economists have conceded Marx was right after all? Have you at any time during the past 40 years heard an economist admit that Marx was correct in his transformation [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part three)

January 14, 2012 11:55 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part three)

In my previous post, I stated: In reality, there was nothing in Bohm-Bawerk’s argument to be disproved. Bohm-Bawerk had indeed cited the essential contradiction at the core of capitalism. His problem, however, was to imagine the contradiction to be a defect of Marx’s theory, and not a fatal flaw laying [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part two)

January 13, 2012 11:15 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part two)

In the previous blog post, I argued that in each of the three great capitalist catastrophes of the 19th and 20th Centuries — the Long Depression, the Great Depression and the Great Stagflation — economists scurried to bone up on Marx in an effort to understand practical problems of state [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx?

January 9, 2012 7:17 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx?

I’m reading, “The Transformation Problem: A Tale of Two Interpretations”, by David Bieri. According to his profile, David studied economics at the London School of Economics and international finance at the University of Durham (UK). In 2006, he started his Ph.D. studies in SPIA. From 1999 until 2006, David held [...]

Read more ›