Post Tagged with: "unemployment"

Guglielmo Carchedi’s bad advice for activists

December 16, 2012 11:18 am6 comments
Guglielmo Carchedi’s bad advice for activists

Keynesian economic policies don’t work, but fighting for these policies will? Guglielmo Carchedi’s essay on the so-called Marxist multiplier has me bugging. He is handing out bad advice to activists in the social movements and telling them this bad advice is based on Marx’s labor theory of value. The bad [...]

Read more ›

Anarchists, Libertarians and Marxists need to change the debate on jobs and debt (2)

October 13, 2012 7:43 pm1 comment
Anarchists, Libertarians and Marxists need to change the debate on jobs and debt (2)

We have to change the terms of the debate on jobs and debt. We need to insist a job is nothing more than wage slavery and we don’t need Washington’s effort to create more of it by adding to this wage slavery even with more debt slavery. It is not [...]

Read more ›

Anarchists, Libertarians and Marxists need to change the debate on jobs and debt (1)

October 6, 2012 2:46 pm0 comments
Anarchists, Libertarians and Marxists need to change the debate on jobs and debt (1)

We have to change the terms of the debate on jobs and debt. We need to insist a job is nothing more than wage slavery and we don’t need Washington’s effort to create more of it adding to this wage slavery even with more debt slavery. It is not like [...]

Read more ›

Letter to the Occupy Movement: The jobs number you never hear about says Washington’s fucked

October 5, 2012 4:52 pm0 comments
Letter to the Occupy Movement: The jobs number you never hear about says Washington’s fucked

Here is an interesting chart from Zero Hedge: In data going back to 1980, employment for younger workers aged 20-24 has never increased in the month of September — that is, it has never increased until this year: I know what you are thinking: the data provided by Washington is [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Final)

January 20, 2012 12:03 pm0 comments
Paul A. Samuelson: bald-faced liar and propagandist for the fascist state

(Or, more importantly, why should anarchists, libertarians and Marxists be as well) So, has any reader of this blog heard that economists have conceded Marx was right after all? Have you at any time during the past 40 years heard an economist admit that Marx was correct in his transformation [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part three)

January 14, 2012 11:55 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part three)

In my previous post, I stated: In reality, there was nothing in Bohm-Bawerk’s argument to be disproved. Bohm-Bawerk had indeed cited the essential contradiction at the core of capitalism. His problem, however, was to imagine the contradiction to be a defect of Marx’s theory, and not a fatal flaw laying [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part two)

January 13, 2012 11:15 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx? (Part two)

In the previous blog post, I argued that in each of the three great capitalist catastrophes of the 19th and 20th Centuries — the Long Depression, the Great Depression and the Great Stagflation — economists scurried to bone up on Marx in an effort to understand practical problems of state [...]

Read more ›

Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx?

January 9, 2012 7:17 am0 comments
Why is the Bank for International Settlements interested in Karl Marx?

I’m reading, “The Transformation Problem: A Tale of Two Interpretations”, by David Bieri. According to his profile, David studied economics at the London School of Economics and international finance at the University of Durham (UK). In 2006, he started his Ph.D. studies in SPIA. From 1999 until 2006, David held [...]

Read more ›

Unemployment: Job Creation or Liberation?

November 23, 2011 5:30 pm0 comments
“All paid jobs absorb and degrade the mind.” – Aristotle

I find it amazing that people will demand Washington create work, but will not demand freedom from unnecessary work created by Washington. The fixation on work is the principal lever of the fascist state. But, the fixation on work is only a reflex of the role fascist state issued currency [...]

Read more ›

A Critique of Pure Bullshit: Part Two: Eichengreen on Ron Paul (Money and Crisis)

August 30, 2011 12:36 pm2 comments
Austrian School economists Ludwig von Mises and his student Friedrich A. Hayek

    Barry Eichengreen makes much of the role the theories of Friedrich Hayek play in Ron Paul’s world view for a reason that becomes immediately clear: In his 2009 book, End the Fed, Paul describes how he discovered the work of Hayek back in the 1960s by reading The [...]

Read more ›

Eichengreen on Ron Paul and Gold as Money: Part One: A critique of pure bullshit:

August 29, 2011 10:22 am0 comments
Eichengreen on Ron Paul and Gold as Money: Part One: A critique of pure bullshit:

Washington has a problem, and Barry Eichengreen is doing his bit to save it. The problem’s name is Ron Paul, and this problem comes wrapped in 24 carat gold: GOLD IS back, what with libertarians the country over looking to force the government out of the business of monetary-policy making. [...]

Read more ›

Theories of the current crisis: Closing thoughts on the hyperinflationists

June 8, 2011 8:47 am0 comments
Theories of the current crisis: Closing thoughts on the hyperinflationists

This is my final installment on the hyperinflationists section of theories of the current crisis for now. As I find in any good examination of a theory out there, I come away from this one with a better understanding of some of the problems of capitalism under conditions of absolute [...]

Read more ›

Theories of the current crisis: Why non-dollar currencies are finished

June 6, 2011 9:05 am0 comments
Theories of the current crisis: Why non-dollar currencies are finished

In a recent post, Deflation or Hyperinflation, FOFOA begins the meat of his argument with investment adviser Rick Ackerman (who, until recently, predicted this present crisis will end in a debt deflation) by directly addressing Ackerman’s core deflationist argument, which originally was set forth in a 1976 book by C.V. [...]

Read more ›

Theories of the current crisis: How FOFOA renders Williams more profound

June 2, 2011 12:58 pm0 comments
Theories of the current crisis: How FOFOA renders Williams more profound

I know I promised to examine John Williams’ argument that hyperinflation hinges on an exogenous political event: the rejection of the dollar as world reserve currency by other nations. I will return to this point. But, before I do, I want to respond to Neverfox, who asked me to evaluate [...]

Read more ›

Theories of the current crisis: What Williams doesn't know about ex nihilo money

May 30, 2011 4:00 pm0 comments
Theories of the current crisis: What Williams doesn't know about ex nihilo money

Even if we assume John Williams’ prediction of a hyperinflationary depression turns out to be correct — and the global economy is plunged into an apocalyptic nightmare as prices rise with blinding rapidity, while economic activity shudders to a standstill — his argument for this outcome is so defective as [...]

Read more ›